ADITYA SINGH @ RISHU SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
A482/6949/2025 · 2025-08-26
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159466 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159466 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6949 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed with the prayer to quash for quashing of summoning order dated 23.01.2024 passed by learned special judge SC/ST Act, Raebareli in Special Session Trial No. 57 of 2024 (State versus Aditya Singh alias Rishu Singh) and charge sheet dated 28.06.2023 concerning case crime no. 294 of 2023, under section 363 IPC and section 3(2) (va) sc/st act, police station salon, district raebareli as well as entire proceedings of special session trial no. 57 of 2024 (State versus Aditya Singh alias Rishu Singh). 3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and were never involved in committing the offence as has been mentioned in the First Information Report. He added that due to enmity, his name has been planted in the First Information Report and thereafter he has been charge-sheeted. He next added that due to unavoidable circumstances, he could not appear before the court below. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dheeraj Awasthi, Bharat Kumar Dixit, Dhanur Singh Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party(s): G.A. Aditya Singh @ Rishu Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. 5. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. 6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties', it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and files bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7.
Further, the applicant will have an opportunity at the appropriate stage to move an application for discharge taking therein all the pleas factual and legal which may be available to him, in accordance with law. In case, such an application is moved before the learned trial court, the learned trial court shall dispose of the same by a speaking and reasoned order strictly, in accordance with law. 8. The application is disposed of accordingly. August 26, 2025 Haseen U. A482 No. 6949 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench