HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - B No. - 819 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri N.C. Upadhyay, learned counsel for petitioners as well a learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent No. 1. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that private respondents have preferred a revision before the Dy. Director of Consolidation, Bahraich which has been registered as Case No. 0399/2025 of which an ad interim injunction has been passed in favour of private respondents and agaisnt the petitioner on 25.07.2025 directing the parties to maintain status quo on the disputed land. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the revision was defective inasmuch as which was filed beyond time prescribed and without condoning the delay the ad interim injunction has been passed. 4. This Court is of the considered view that any further interference in the impugned order will only lead to the delay in the pendency of the revision and accordingly in the interest of justice present writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move an application for vacation of the interim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Naveen Chandra Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Amit Kumar And Another .....Petitioner(s) Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Bahraich And Others .....Respondent(s) order dated 25.07.2025 and in case such an application is moved within next two weeks from today, the Dy. Director of Consolidation shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter by reasoned and speaking order after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties. September 1, 2025 Ravi/ WRIB No. 819 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench