MOHD. MUJEEB v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
CRLP/7824/2025 · 2025-09-22
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159461 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159461 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7824 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
1. Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri G.D. Bhatt, learned AGA for the State-opposite parties no.1 to 4 and Sri Hemant Kumar Mishra, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.5. Said Vakalatnama is taken on record.
2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main reliefs:-
"a. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties no. 1 to 4, particularly the opposite parties 2 to 4, to take all legal and necessary action, according to law, against the opposite party no.5 in pursuance of the first information report, lodged by the petitioner against him on 21.1.2025, at 15.21 hours, vide F.I.R. No.24 of 2025, under sections-406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Nawabganj, District- Gonda, as contained in Annexure no.1 to this writ petition. b. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no.2 to carry out the investigation of F.I.R. No.24 of 2025, under sections- 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 I.P.C., relating to the Police Station- Nawabganj, District- Gonda, in free, fair and impartial manner as well as under his supervision."
3. At the very outset, Sri G.D. Bhatt, learned AGA, has produced photostat copy of the charge sheet, the same is taken on record. Learned AGA has stated that charge sheet has been filed against opposite party no.5, therefore, this writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Pankaj Kumar Singh Mohd. Mujeeb .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. Sri Hemant Kumar Mishra has, however, informed that after submission of the charge sheet, the matter has been referred for further investigation.
5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed being infructuous.
6. Consigned to record September 22, 2025 RBS/- CRLP No. 7824 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench