Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159418 (ALL)

BHIM SHANKAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/9527/2025 · 2025-08-26

Manish Mathur

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9527 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to authority concerned for considering petitioner's transfer to his own home District, Gorakhpur in terms of Government Order dated 06.05.2025 since petitioner has barely one and a half years left to superannuate. 3.Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.4 i.e. Chairman, P.A.C. Establishment Board, Lucknow P.A.C. Head Quarter, Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order. 4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. August 26, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kapil Dev Chaubey, Amit Bhardwaj, Sanjay Chaubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Bhim Shankar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench