Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159414 (ALL)

GUDIYA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

ABAIL/914/2025 · 2025-08-25

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 914 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for State as well as perused the record. 2. The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No.196 of 2023, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 Indian Penal Code, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Bahriach. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant, after arguing for some time, does not want to press this anticipatory bail application rather seeks liberty to file a regular bail application in view of law laid by Supreme Court in order dated 7.10.2021 passed in Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.5191 of 2021 Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another. 4. In view of the above, present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not pressed. It is provided that in case a regular bail application is filed within twenty days' from today before the court below, the same be decided expeditiously in view of the law laid by by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil (supra). August 25, 2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Santosh Kumar Dwivedi, Sandeep Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Gudiya Devi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench