RAM RAGHUVEER SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/9479/2025 · 2025-08-25
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159406 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159406 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9479 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for the opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:-
"To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing the provisions of restoration period as 15 years as provided in the Government Orders dated 23.7.1987 and 6.12.1990 as contained in Annexure-3 & 4 respectively. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding the opposite parties to restore the commuted pension on expiry of 10 years 11 months or at the best 11 years instead of 15 years as provided in the Government Order dated 23.7.1987, 6.12.1980 and 8.12.2008 as contained in Annexure-3, 4 & 5 respectively. iii) To issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding the opposite parties not to deduct the amount of commuted portion of pension from the monthly pension of the petitioners beyond 10 years 11 month or at the best 11 years during the pendency of this writ petition. iv) To issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding the opposite parties to refund the excess amount of money to the petitioner recovered from their pension against the commuted amount of pension of the petitioner with interest....." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Srivastava, Navneet Awasthi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Raghuveer Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Public Works Deptt. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
3. Learned counsel for the parties admit that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by judgment of this Court in WRIT - A No. - 5617 of 2024 (Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko 3 Others) and other connected matters decided on 28.05.2025. 4. Considering aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of finally providing that petitioner of this writ petition shall also be entitled to benefit of judgment rendered in WRIT - A No. - 5617 of 2024 (Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko 3 Others).
August 25, 2025 Satish WRIA No. 9479 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench