HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 424 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard Sri Prateek Tewari, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri S.P. Tiwari, learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. The present revision has been filed by the revisionist/applicant alongwith with an application (C.M. Application No. 2 of 2025) seeking condonation of delay for the following main relief(s):- "Wherefore, it is in the interest of justice and is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to set aside the impugned summoning order dated: 10.07.2024 passed by the Learned Civil Judge (J.D.) FTC/ Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow in Complaint Case No. 8560/2024 (In re: Pradeep Vikram Singh Versus Jaswant And Others) Under Section 504, 506 IPC P.S. Sushant Golf City, District Lucknow whereby the applicant has been summoned to face the trial for the offences u/s 504, 506 IPC." On being confronted, learned counsel for the revisionist, after arguing the matter at some length, says that the instant revision may be disposed of with liberty to the revisionist to seek benefit of law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the revisionist. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra) , this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Prateek Tewari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Gaurav Siddharth .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the revisionist applies for bail, whichever is earlier, they would not take any coercive action against the revisionist in the aforesaid case. It is made clear that in this regard, no application shall be entertained. With the aforesaid observations, the present revision is disposed of. August 26, 2025 Arun/- CRLRD No. 424 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench