Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159384 (ALL)

PARTAP SINGH (IN FIR PARTAP) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/7785/2025 · 2025-09-18

Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7785 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Heard Shri Ramakar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Girijesh Kumar Dwivedi, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and Shri Vivek Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party No.4. The same is taken on record. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the impugned First Information Report (in short F.I.R.) dated 28.07.2025 bearing FIR/ Case Crime No.270 of 2025, under Section 105 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station- Mallawan, District-Hardoi, so far as it relates to the present petitioner, as contained in Annexure No.1 to the writ petition. 3. After strong opposition made by the learned counsels for the opposite parties, Shri Ramakar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that this writ petition may be disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to file anticipatory bail application before the Competent Court of law and direction may be issued her/ him to dispose of such application with expedition. 4. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue and considering the aforesaid innocuous request of learned counsel for the petitioner, we hereby dispose of this petition at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to file an anticipatory bail application before the Competent Court of law within a period of two weeks from today taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him and if such application is filed by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the same may be disposed of, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition. September18,2025 Suresh/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramakar Shukla, Abhinav Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Manish Kumar Yadav, Vivek Kumar Divedi (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Partap Singh (In Fir Partap) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench