KOMMOJU SUDHA & 2 OTHERS v. KOMMOJU SATYA VENKATA MALLIKARJUNA RAO & THE STATE OF A.P.
CRLRC/1897/2011 · 2025-07-30
T Mallikarjuna Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15938 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15938 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010206752011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Between:
1. KOMMOJU SUDHA & 2 OTHERS, W/O SATYA VENKATA MALLIKARJUNA RAO, R/O QTR.NO.307/2, SECTOR UKKUNAGARAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. KOMMOJU PRANAVILAYA,, RAO, R/O QTR.NO.307/2, SECTOR VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. KOMMOJU SRAVAN,, S/O SATYA VENKATA MALLIKARJUNA RAO, R/O QTR.NO.307/2, SECTOR VISAKHAPATNAM. (PETITIONERS 2 & 3 BEING MINORS, REP. BY THEIR MOTHER AND GUARDIAN THE 1ST PETITIONERS). 1. KOMMOJU SATYA VENKATA MALLIKARJUNA RAO THE STATE OF A P, S/O LAKSHMANA RAO, EMPLOYEE, STEEL PLANT R/O FLAT NO.2, SHAKTI APARTMENTS, BALAYYA SASTRY LAYOUT, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1897 OF 2011 KOMMOJU SUDHA & 2 OTHERS, W/O SATYA VENKATA MALLIKARJUNA RAO, R/O QTR.NO.307/2, SECTOR UKKUNAGARAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. KOMMOJU PRANAVILAYA,, D/O SATYA VENKATA MALLIKARJUNA RAO, R/O QTR.NO.307/2, SECTOR-IV, UKKUNAGARAM, KOMMOJU SRAVAN,, S/O SATYA VENKATA MALLIKARJUNA RAO, R/O QTR.NO.307/2, SECTOR-IV, UKKUNAGARAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. (PETITIONERS 2 & 3 BEING MINORS, REP. BY MOTHER AND GUARDIAN THE 1ST PETITIONERS). ...PETITIONER(S) AND KOMMOJU SATYA VENKATA MALLIKARJUNA RAO THE STATE OF A P, S/O LAKSHMANA RAO, EMPLOYEE, STEEL PLANT R/O FLAT NO.2, SHAKTI APARTMENTS, BALAYYA SASTRY LAYOUT, OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3369] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO KOMMOJU SUDHA & 2 OTHERS, W/O SATYA VENKATA MALLIKARJUNA RAO, R/O QTR.NO.307/2, SECTOR-IV, D/O SATYA VENKATA MALLIKARJUNA IV, UKKUNAGARAM, KOMMOJU SRAVAN,, S/O SATYA VENKATA MALLIKARJUNA RAO, IV, UKKUNAGARAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. (PETITIONERS 2 & 3 BEING MINORS, REP. BY MOTHER AND GUARDIAN THE 1ST PETITIONERS).
...PETITIONER(S) KOMMOJU SATYA VENKATA MALLIKARJUNA RAO THE STATE OF A P, S/O LAKSHMANA RAO, EMPLOYEE, STEEL PLANT R/O FLAT NO.2, SHAKTI APARTMENTS, BALAYYA SASTRY LAYOUT, OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the
CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present this memorandum of Crl.R.C., against the Order dated 15.04.2011 of the Addl. Family Court, Visakhapatnam passed in M.C.No.33 of 2007. IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CRLRCMP 2733 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of (26) days in resubmitting the present Crl.R.C.S.R.No.22332 of 2011 filed against the Order dated 15.04.2011 of the Addl. Family Court, Visakhapatnam passed in M.C.No.33 of 2007. IA NO: 2 OF 2011(CRLRCMP 2825 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to pay Rs.5,000/- each to the petitioners 1 and 2 and Rs.2,500/- to the 3rd petitioner during the pendency of the revision petition. Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K S MALLIKARJUNA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following:
ORDER:-
This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the order dated 15.04.2011 passed by the Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam in M.C.No.33 of 2007.
2. No representation on behalf of the petitioner.
3. Perused the entire material on record.
4. Pursuant to the directions of this Court dated 03.7.2025, notices could not be served despite best efforts made by the Secretary, District Legal
Services Authority, Visakhapatnam. It seems that parties are not residing in the addresses shown in the Criminal Revision Petition and the petitioner is not showing interest to prosecute the case. The Criminal Revision Case is pending since 2011. As both the parties are not showing interest, this Court is inclined to dismiss the Criminal Revision Case for non-prosecution.
5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for non prosecution.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Revision Case, shall stand closed.
____________________________ JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Dated: 31.7.2025 TJN
161 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1897 OF 2011 Dated: 31.7.2025 TJN
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AT AMARAVATI
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1897 OF 2011 PROCEEDING SHEET
SL. NO. DATE
ORDER OFFICE NOTE
11.
31.7.2025 TMR, J
The Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for non-prosecution. (vide separate order) ______ TMR, J TJN