SIYA RAM VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. FINANCE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/9476/2025 · 2025-08-25
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159372 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159372 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9476 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for the opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the provisions stating restoration period as 15 years in the Uttar Pradesh Civil Pension (Commutation) Rules, 1941 as amended by Government Order No. सा-3-1508/दस- 2008-308-97, dated 08.12.2008 issued by the Finance (General) Section-3 of State of Uttar Pradesh contained in Annexure No.2 to this writ petition after summoning the records. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus restraining the opposite parties from recovering the excess amount from the Petitioner, retiral dues i.e. pension as the commuted amount has already been recovered. (iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus for restoration of the commuted pension after expiry of 10 years 11 months or at best 11 years instead of 15 years as provided in rules and the government orders. (iv) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite parties not to deduct the amount of commuted portion of pension from the monthly pension of the Petitioner, after expiration of 10 years 11 months or at best 11 years Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vikas Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Siya Ram Verma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Finance Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
during the pendency of this writ petition before this Hon'ble Court....."
3. Learned counsel for the parties admit that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by judgment of this Court in WRIT - A No. - 5617 of 2024 (Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko 3 Others) and other connected matters decided on 28.05.2025. 4. Considering aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of finally providing that petitioner of this writ petition shall also be entitled to benefit of judgment rendered in WRIT - A No. - 5617 of 2024 (Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko 3 Others).
August 25, 2025 Satish WRIA No. 9476 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench