Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15937 (AP)

G VIJAYA BHASKAR RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/10903/2025 · 2025-07-29

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010206672025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 10903/2025 Between: 1. G VIJAYA BHASKAR RAO, CONTRACTOR, S/O. LAKSHMAIAH, D.NO. 2-2-39, SRI RANGANATHA NAGAR, NAWABPET, NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION AND COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2 TCDS,J W.P.No.10903 of 2025 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, CENTRAL DIVISION, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, T.G.P.Q.C., KALUVOYA, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or a direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents, in non-payment of amount due to me even after finalizing the bills, payable to me in relation to the total 6 works executed by them to a total amount of 43,51,793/-as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unreasonable and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to consider the payment of amount due to the petitioner in respect of execution of works forthwith and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the payment of amount payable to the petitioner i.e., Rs. 43,51,793 immediately pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C VAMSI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING 3 TCDS,J W.P.No.10903 of 2025 The Court made the following order: The petitioner claims that, pursuant to the online tenders invited by the 5th respondent, the petitioner participated in the same and became the successful bidder. Subsequently, the petitioner entered into agreement vide Agreement Nos.252/O&M/DN/2020-21, dated 05.11.2020, 87/O&M/DN/2020-21, dated 03.09.2021, 228/O&M/DN/2019-20, dated 05.03.2020, 49/O&M/DN/2021-22, dated 24.08.2021, 50/O&M/DN/2021-22 dated 24.08.2021 and 253/O&M/DN/2020-21 dated 01.10.2021. In furtherance thereto, the petitioner executed and completed the works within the time prescribed in the agreements. It is further case of the petitioner that the Engineers in the Irrigation Department have inspected the works executed by the petitioner and, thereafter, the same were super- checked by the Quality Control Team. The 5th respondent, after full satisfaction, forwarded the records i.e., agreements, M-book, bill forms etc. to the Accounts Department, so as to pay the same to the petitioner. It is further case of the petitioner that despite completion of works within the stipulated time and coupled with the fact that the Quality Control Team has issued Quality Control Certificates dated 09.04.2021, 22.03.2022, 16.02.2021, 09.03.2022, 22.03.2022 and 09.04.2021, for the reasons best known to the respondents, the said 4 TCDS,J W.P.No.10903 of 2025 amounts has not been released till today. Questioning the same, the present writ petition is filed. 2. On the other hand, learned Government Pleader for Irrigation would fairly admitted that the petitioner has executed the aforementioned works, and did not dispute the Quality Control Certificates issued by the respondents. 3. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Irrigation, there is no justification on the part of the respondents in not releasing the amount payable to the petitioner in respect of works completed by the petitioner in terms of subject agreements. 4. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to release the amount payable to the petitioner in respect of works completed by the petitioner under the subject agreements, within a period of ten (10) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Date.30.07.2025 KGR