SHAHJAHAN BEGAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/7979/2025 · 2025-08-26
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159368 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159368 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7979 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Suresh Chand Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Amit Kumar Dwivedi, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.132 of 2025, under Sections 3/5A/8/5B of Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughters Act and Section 4/25 Arms Act, registered at Police Station Tarun, District Ayodhya. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged by Sub-Inspector of Police on 02.07.2025 against four persons including the applicant, stating that on the basis of information received from mukhbir, the police party raided the house of the applicant and found that all the four accused persons had tied a cow progeny and one of the them was preparing to slaughter it. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent, she has been falsely implicated in the present case and she has no criminal history. 5. The co-accused Haider Ali has been granted bail by means of an order dated 31.07.2025 by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.7089 - of 2025. 6. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail applicant and he has submitted that the allegations have been established during the investigation and a charge sheet has been submitted on 06.08.2025. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nishendra Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shahjahan Begam .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
7. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that in the F.I.R. similar allegations have been levelled against all the accused persons; that the a co-accused person has been granted bail whereas the applicant has no criminal history and she is languishing in jail since 07.02.2025 whereas the investigation already stands concluded, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 9.
Let the applicant - Shahjahan Begam be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. August 26, 2025 S. Shivhare BAIL No. 7979 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench