ANAND KUMAR TURI ALIAS ANAND KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4648/2025 · 2025-06-05
Deepak Roshan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15935 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15935 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:14724 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 4648 of 2025
---------
1. Anand Kumar Turi @ Anand Kumar S/o late Raghu Turi @ Raghu Tudu, aged about 20 years R/o washery colony, Religarha P.O. & P.S.-Giddi, Distt-Hazaribag.
2. Kripal Bediya S/o Rameshwar Bediya, aged about 35 years Resident of village kurkutta P.O & P.S.-Giddi, Distt. Hazaribag.
....Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand
....Opp. Party
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Himanshu Harsh, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. V.S. Sahay, A.P.P.
--------- 02/Dated:-05.06.2025
1.
Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2.
The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioners for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 308(5)/61/3(5) of the B.N.S. in connection with Patratu (Bhurkunda O.P) P.S. Case No.204/2024.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case and they have committed no offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that the petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. and there is no direct evidence linking them to the alleged incident; petitioners’ presence at the alleged place of occurrence is not established and the case diary submitted by the Investigating Officer does not mention any evidence linking the petitioners’ cell location or any other material to prove their involvement in the offence; petitioners were not present at the time of the incident; petitioners have not been put to T.I. parade; petitioners for no offence has been languishing in custody since 04.09.2024; as such, the petitioners may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioners are ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court.
4.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
2025:JHHC:14724 2
5.
Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegation made against these petitioners coupled with the fact that the petitioners are in custody since 04.09.2024; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge these petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class Ramgarh in connection with Patratu (Bhurkunda O.P) P.S. Case No.204/2024.
6.
It is made clear that the petitioners shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and they shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against these petitioners, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of these petitioners.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) vikas/-