KARIA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/7755/2025 · 2025-09-17
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159345 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159345 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7755 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
1. Heard Sri Gyanendra Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri S.N. Tilhari, learned AGA for the State- respondents and perused the record.
2. In view of proposed order, notices to opposite party nos. 4 to 7 are dispensed with.
3. This writ petition has been filed for issuance of mandamus directing the opposite party no.2 to transfer the investigation of FIR No.0192 of 2025, under Section 87 and 137(2) BNS, 2023 police station Visheshwarganj, district Bahraich and further to take coercive measures against opposite parties 4 to 7.
4. Learned A.G.A. appearing for the State-respondents has produced before this Court written instructions sent by Sri Udai Pratap of police station Visheshwarganj, district Bahraich dated 01.09.2025, which is taken on record. As per aforesaid instruction, earlier Investigating Officer had conducted and concluded the investigation and submitted final report before the Supervisory Authority but after perusing the final report so prepared, the Supervisory Authority has directed for further investigation for which Sri Ruab Ali, Sub-Inspector has been Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gyanendra Pathak, Suneel Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Karia .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
deputed, who is conducting further investigation in the matter. Sri Tilhari stated that grievance of the petitioner has been redressed as the Supervisory Authority has directed for further investigation and the Investigating Officer has also been changed therefore, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present case by this Court.
5. Considering the aforesaid fact, we do not find it appropriate to keep this writ petition pending any longer but, at the same time, we expect that the Investigating Officer shall conduct the investigation strictly in accordance with law and the procedure so prescribed and conclude the same with expedition. This writ petition is consigned to record.
September 17, 2025 Rks.
CRLP No. 7755 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench