ASHUTOSH KUMAR AND 35 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC EDU. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/9478/2025 · 2025-08-25
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159337 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159337 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9478 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
1. Heard Sri Ankit Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri P.K. Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent No.1, Sri Prashant Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2 and Dr. Uday Veer Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondents No.3 and 4.
2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided.
3. The petitioners, who are all incharge Head Masters/ Head Mistresses are before this Court seeking a writ of mandamus for payment of arrears in the light of judgment passed in Special Appeal No.652 of 2024 in re: Secretary, U.P. Basic Education Board and others vs. Tripurai Dubey and others.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioners may be permitted to submit fresh representations before respondent no.3 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsels for respondents have no objection.
5. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioners submit individual representations within two weeks from today before Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ankit Kumar Pandey, Hairdaya Narain Tiwari, Hari Mangal Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ran Vijay Singh, Uday Veer Singh Ashutosh Kumar And 35 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Edu. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
respondent no.3, then respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of eight weeks from the date of submission of the representations along with certified copy of this order.
6. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of.
7. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. August 25, 2025 cks/- WRIA No. 9478 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench