AKHILESH YADAV v. STATE OF UP THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME GOVT. LKO.
BAIL/7916/2025 · 2025-08-25
Subhash Vidyarthi
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159325 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159325 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7916 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Smt. Manjusha Kapil, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Mayank Sinha, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.0221 of 2025, under Sections 2(b)(i)/2(b)(xi)/3(1) of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, registered at Police Station Kakori, District Lucknow. 3. The gang chart mentions involvement of the applicant in two cases, in which he has been granted bail. The applicant is involved in one another case, in which he has been enlarged on bail. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It has also been stated in the affidavit filed in support of the bail application that the applicant is neither a leader nor member of any gang. 5. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases mentioned in the gang chart and in the other case in which he is involved and that the applicant is languishing in jail since 06.03.2025 and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 7. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 8. Let the applicant-Akhilesh Yadav be released on bail in the aforesaid Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kamlesh Singh, Manjusha Kapil, Sushil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Akhilesh Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of Up Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Lko.
.....Opposite Party(s)
case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. August 25, 2025 Ram. BAIL No. 7916 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench