Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15932 (JHR)

MD ABID KHAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4633/2025 · 2025-06-05

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:14717 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4633 of 2025 --------- Md. Abid Khan aged about 50 years son of Md. Salim, resident of 43, Gariwan Mohalla, P.O. and P.S. Parsudih, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Vineet Kumar Vashishtha, A.P.P. --------- 02/Dated:-05.06.2025 1. Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 17(c), 21(c), 22(c) and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act in connection with Parsudih P.S. Case No.10 of 2025. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that no independent witness of the alleged seizure has been made. He further submits that though the petitioner has some criminal antecedents but in those cases either the petitioner is on bail or acquitted by the learned court below. He further submits that the charge sheet has been filed on 20.04.2025 without F.S.L. report and petitioner for no offence has been languishing in custody since 28.01.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegation made against this petitioner coupled with the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 28.01.2025; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be 2025:JHHC:14717 2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, (NDPS Act) at Jamshedpur in connection with Parsudih P.S. Case No.10 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) vikas/-