SHAIK MOHAMMAD RAFI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/10793/2025 · 2025-04-25
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15932 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15932 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010207522025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 10793/2025 Between: Shaik Mohammad Rafi ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PONNEKANTI MALLIKARJUNA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following Order:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the 5th respondent in not registering any crime on the complaint of the petitioner dated 31.03.2025.
3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home submits that the complaint of the petitioner dated 31.03.2025 will be considered by the respondents, as per the law.
2
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to dispose of the Writ Petition at the stage of admission itself, directing the 5th respondent to consider the petitioner’s complaint dated 31.03.2025, in accordance with law and as per the procedure contemplated under Section 173(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, (for short, “BNSS”), if not already considered.
5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
6. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dated : 25.04.2025 BMS