HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9494 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and Sriniwas Bajpai, learned counsels for respondents. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being finally decided. The petitioner aggrieved by order dated NIL, a copy of which is annexure 1 to the writ petition, whereby the salary of the petitioner has been stopped. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the reliefs sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before the respondents no.2 i.e. Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Tambaur, Ahamdabad, District Sitapur & respondent no. 3 i.e. Chairperson, Nagar Panchayat, Tambaur, Ahamdabad, District Sitapur which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned Counsel for the respondents have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within a week from today before respondents no.2 & 3 then respondents no.2 & 3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and the relevant rules within a further period of four weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Madhav Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sriniwas Bajpai Pradeep Kumar Balmeeki .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy., Nagar Vikas, Lko And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. August 25, 2025 J. K. Dinkar WRIA No. 9494 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench