IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13236 of 2017 ====================================================== Md. Asgar Imam son of Late Hashim Raza, Resident of Village- Herthu, P.O.- Khudaganj, P.S.- Islampur, District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Commissioner, Patna Commissionery, Patna. 3. Addl. Collector-cum- District Right to Public Grievance Officer, Biharsharif, Nalanda. 4. Circle Officer, Islampur Block, District- Nalanda. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar, AAG-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 14-07-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “(i) To quash the order dated 20.03.2017 passed by Secretary, Rural Development Department, Patna, Bihar (Second Appellate Tribunal) who has dismissed the appeal of the petitioner preferred against the order dated 06.02.2017 passed by the Commissioner, Patna only on the grounds that he has no jurisdiction to interfere in the order of the Commissioner and he could not decide the ownership of the land in question, which is illegal without jurisdiction. (ii) To direct the respondents provide Patna High Court CWJC No.13236 of 2017(3) dt.14-07-2025 2/2 compensation of the land in question bearing Khata No. 304, Khesra No. 361, total area 280 decimals which has been used in temporary road from Herthu to Islampur out of 2 bigha raiyati land of the petitioner bearing Chak No. 160, Khata No. 286 is adjoining land to the aforesaid road, acquired for the purpose of Pradhan Mantri Gramin Sarak Yojna in 2009 but as yet no compensation has been paid to the petitioner at all. Now this grievance comes under the Bihar Right to Public Grievance Redressal Act, 2015. (iii) To any other relief/reliefs the petitioner is entitled too.” 3. On the instruction of the learned counsel for the petitioner, a prayer has been made for the withdrawal of the petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U