AMARNATH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
WRIC/8089/2025 · 2025-08-27
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159287 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159287 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8089 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Head Sri Kuldeep Pandey, learned counsel for petitioner as well as leaned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outset submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to file afresh after making necessary corrections.
3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid submission.
4. Accordingly, in view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty.
August 27, 2025 Ravi/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kuldeep Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Amarnath .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench