VASIKURRAHMAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF NAGAR VIKAS LKO. AND ANOTHER
WRIC/8212/2025 · 2025-08-28
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159281 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159281 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8212 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Shyam Singh, Advocate who has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no.3, which is taken on record.
2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayers:-
"i) A writ order in nature of mandamus to direct to O.P. No. 02 to 03 to issue certificate of birth for the son of the petitioner by deciding the application of the petitioner contained as Annexure no.01, in the interest of justice."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that the writ petition has become infructuous as the relief claimed regarding issuance of birth certificate has already been granted by the Nagar Palika Parishad.
4. Sri Shyam Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 3/Nagar Palika Parishad, Karnilganj, Gonda does not dispute this contention.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. August 28, 2025 Darpan Sharma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Tewari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shyam Singh (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Vasikurrahman .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Nagar Vikas Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DARPAN SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench