HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9468 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority for payment of interest on the delayed made for the payment of General Provident Fund to petitioner. 3. For the aforesaid grievance, petitioner has already submitted a representation to the authorities concerned but seeks liberty to file a fresh representation. 4. Considering innocuous prayer being made by learned counsel for petitioner and without entering into merits of the case, petitioner is granted liberty to move a fresh representation before respondent no. 2 i.e., District Inspector of Schools, District Sultanpur who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, petition stands disposed of. August 25, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Siyaram Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Jagdamba Prasad Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Secondary Edu. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench