SMT. BHIKHANA v. SRI AWDHESH KUMAR, S.D.O., UTRAULA, BALRAMPUR
CAPL/3671/2024 · 2025-01-17
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159265 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159265 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:3183 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3671 of 2024 Applicant :- Smt. Bhikhana Opposite Party :- Sri Awdhesh Kumar, S.D.O., Utraula, Balrampur Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Priya Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Prabhakar Tiwari Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1. Case has been called in the revised list.
2. Shri Prabhakar Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent/ opposite party has filed an affidavit of compliance enclosing therein the copy of order dated 10.10.2024 i.e. decision in the proceedings under Section 229-B of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1950 in compliance of the judgment and order passed by the writ court dated 20.05.2022. The relevant extract of the
judgment is quoted here-in-below.
"Considering the facts and circumstances as well as from a perusal of the material available on record, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.3 to consider and finally decide the Case bearing No. 52/1996-1997, Computerized Case No. T199708100300025 (Smt. Bhikhana Vs. Parsuram, and Others ) under Section 229-B of the U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act pending before it most expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably within a period of three months from the date an authenticated copy of this order is placed before the authority concerned."
3. Neither learned counsel for the applicant is present to raise objection against the submissions made by learned counsel for the respondent nor any request has been made on his behalf for adjournment of the case as such. The respondent has complied with the judgment and order passed by the writ Court by deciding the mutation proceeding/ representation of the applicant.
4. In view of the above, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous.
5. Notice issued earlier, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 17.1.2025 Mohd. Sharif Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench