Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159250 (ALL)

SURENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/7728/2025 · 2025-09-15

Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7728 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1.Heard Sri Shivang Dwivedi, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Amol Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and Sri Manish Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the opposite party No.4. 2.By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the impugned First Information Report (in short F.I.R.) dated 17.07.2025 bearing FIR/ Case Crime No.0249 of 2025, under Sections 108, 352 & 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station-Bihar, District-Unnao, so far as it relates to the present petitioner, as contained in Annexure No.1 to the writ petition. 3.Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter at some length has requested that the petitioner may be given liberty to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court of law and direction may be issued to consider and decide the same with expedition. 4.Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, without interfering with the impugned F.I.R. and considering the aforesaid request of learned counsel for the petitioner, we hereby dispose of this writ petition finally at the admission stage by giving liberty to the present petitioner to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court of law within a period of two weeks from today, and if such application is filed by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the same may be heard and decided, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition. September 15, 2025 Suresh/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amol Kumar Srivastava, Aditya Kumar, Shivang Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Manish Singh Chauhan (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Surendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench