SUNEETA DEVI v. NAIB TEHSILDAR BASKHARI, TEHSIL TANDA, AMBEDKAR NAGAR AND OTHERS
A227/5002/2025 · 2025-08-25
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159245 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159245 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5002 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Niyaj Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 to decide the pending restoration / recall application dated 24.07.2024 filed by the petitioner in case no. T202104040304085, U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Suneeta Devi Vs. Rakesh Kumar)expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Naib Tehsildar, Baskhari, Tehsil - Tanda, Ditrict Ambedkar Nagar is directed to decide the pending restoration / recall application dated 24.07.2024 filed by the petitioner in case no. T202104040304085, U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Suneeta Devi Vs. Rakesh Kumar), expeditiously, say within a period of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Niyaj Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Suneeta Devi .....Petitioner(s) Naib Tehsildar Baskhari, Tehsil Tanda, Ambedkar Nagar And Others .....Respondent(s)
three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. August 25, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 5002 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench