Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15923 (KAR)

MR C A SRIRAMAIAH v. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (REVENUE)

WP/11178/2019 · 2025-01-21

Jyoti Mulimani

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2447 WP No. 11178 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 11178 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MR C.A.SRIRAMAIAH S/O LATE ABBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, RESIDING AT CHANNASANDRA, ABBAYAPPA COMPOUND, KADUGODI POST, BANGALORE-560 067. 2. MR. C.A.SRINIVAS S/O LATE ABBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT CHANNASANDRA, ABBAYAPPA COMPOUND, KADUGODI POST, BANGALORE-560 067. 3. MR C.A.ASHOK KUMAR S/O LATE ABBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT CHANNASANDRA, ABBAYAPPA COMPOUND, KADUGODI POST, BANGALORE-560 067. 4. MR C.A.ASHWATH NARAYANA S/O LATE ABBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT CHANNASANDRA, ABBAYAPPA COMPOUND, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2447 WP No. 11178 of 2019 KADUGODI POST, BANGALORE-560 067. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. G.C.MAHABALESHWAR., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (REVENUE), BANGALORE DISTRICT, BANGALORE-560 009. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE-560 036. 3. THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER, BBMP WARD NO.83, KADUGODI, BANGALORE-560 067. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KADUGODI POLICE STATION, BANGALORE-560 067. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SRINIVAS KUMAR.M., AGA FOR R1, 2 & 4; R3-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2447 WP No. 11178 of 2019 ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.Srinivas Kumar.M., HCGP for respondents 1, 2 and 4 has appeared in person. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 10.09.2024 and 24.09.2024, on these dates, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. The petition is listed today. As could be seen from the writ papers, the petition is filed in the year 2019. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The petition is pending from six years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 15