2025:HHC:19394 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.9779 of 2025 Decided on: 23.06.2025 Suresh Kumar … Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner : Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3-State. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice confined to respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3-State. 2. In the light of the prayer made in the writ petition, without making any observations on the merit of the case, this petition is disposed of with the observation that in case encroachment proceedings were initiated against the private respondent and the said proceedings have attained finality against the private respondent, as submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner, then the Authorities will take the fresh proceedings to their logical conclusion, of course, by adhering to the principles of 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:19394 natural justice, within a period of three months from today. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 23, 2025 (Rishi)