Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15923 (ALL)

KHURSHEED AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/571/2017 · 2025-09-14

Samit Gopal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 571 of 2017 Court No. - 64 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J. 1. List revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the applicant(s) to press this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 3. Sri Ajay Singh, learned AGA-I for the State is present. 4. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant-Khursheed Ahmad with the prayers to quash the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No.570 of 2014, u/s 323, 354, 511, 504, 506, 420, 425 IPC, P.S. Afzalgarh, District Bijnor arising out of charge sheet dated 21.11.2013 in case crime no.251 of 2013 u/s 323, 354, 511, 504, 506, 420, 425 IPC, P.S. Afzalgarh, District Bijnor pending before A.C.J.M. Nagina, Bijnor and further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to stay the further proceeding of Criminal Case No.570 of 2014, u/s 323, 354, 511, 504, 506, 420, 425 IPC, P.S. Afzalgarh, District Bijnor arising out of charge sheet dated 21.11.2013 in case crime no.251 of 2013 u/s 323, 354, 511, 504, 506, 420, 425 IPC, P.S. Afzalgarh, District Bijnor pending before A.C.J.M. Nagina, Bijnor, during the pendency application before this Hon'ble Court. 5. This matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court vide order dated 10.1.2017 subject to deposit of Rs.25,000/-by the applicants. As per report of the Mediation Centre dated 3.5.2017, the applicants have not deposited the said money before the Centre till 2.5.2017. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pavan Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Khursheed Ahmad .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. In view of the same, this matter is reported by the office through the report dated 4.2.2025 of Registrar (J) (Listing) that it is likely to be infructuous. 7. Perused the records. 8. Since there is no one appearing on behalf of the applicant(s) to press this application U/s 482 Cr.P.C., the matter being likely to have become infructuous by efflux of time, the same is dismissed as such. 9. The present application is dismissed as infructuous. 10. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 11. Registrar (Compliance) to communicate this order to the District and Sessions Judge/trial court concerned within a week. September 15, 2025 Gaurav Kuls A482 No. 571 of 2017 2 (Samit Gopal,J.) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad