Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159205 (ALL)

RAM JANAM VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. (DEPTT. OF REVENUE), LKO. AND OTHERS

WRIC/8010/2025 · 2025-08-21

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:49117 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8010 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Janam Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Deptt. Of Revenue), Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shivangi Pandey,Kuldeep Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Ms. Shivangi Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel on behalf of respondent No.s 1 to 4 while notice on behalf of respondent No.5 has been accepted by Sri Mohan Singh. 2. In light of the proposed order notice to private respondents id dispensed with. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had moved an application under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue code for mutating name of the petitioner in place of his father's name i.e. late Hari Ram who died in 2010. The application of the petitioner under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code was allowed by Naib Tehsildar, vide order dated 23.9.2010. Against the order dated 23.9.2010 opposite party No.5 had filed a belated revision before Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Tehsil Sadar, District Ayodhya on which notice have been issued to the petitioner and the order passed by Naib Tehsildar in favour of the petitioner has been stayed vide interim order dated 28.7.2025. It is against the interim order dated 28.7.2025 that the present writ petition has been filed. 4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner shall stand substantially redressed in case the revisional authority i.e. Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya is directed to decide the revision No.2755/2024 in re:- Smt. Sanget Vs. Ram Janam, expeditiously. 5. Learned Standing counsel does not object to the innocuous prayer made by the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to opposite party No.3 i.e. Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to consider and decide Revision No.2755/2024, computerized case No.C 202404000002755 (Smt. Sangeeta Vs. Ram Janam and others), under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before him, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. The petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the revisional proceedings and also to file objections, if any, within next three weeks. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 21.8.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench