RAM BAHADUR @ RAM BAHADUR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/7775/2025 · 2025-09-16
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159196 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159196 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7775 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. Heard Ms. Prashansa Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Arvind Kumar Maurya, learned counsel for the Caveator/ opposite party no.4. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed the following main relief(s):-
"(I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereby quash the impugned First Information Report dated 01.07.2025 lodged by the opposite party no. 6/complainant as F.I.R. No. 0108/2025, Under Section-115 (2), 352, 351 (3), 324 (2), 76, 333 & 64 of BNS Act, 2023 & Section-3/4 POCSO Act, 2012, Police Station- Kumarganj, District-Ayodhya, so far as it relates to the present petitioner, as contained in Annexure No. 2 to the writ petition.
[II] Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing to the opposite parties not to arrest or harass the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned First Information Report dated 01.07.2025 lodged by the opposite party no. 6/complainant as F.I.R. No. 0108/2025, Under Section-115 (2), 352, 351 (3), 324 (2), 76, 333 & 64 of BNS Act, 2023 & Section-3/4 POCSO Act, 2012, Police Station- Kumarganj, District-Ayodhya, contained in Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition." Sri Srivastava, learned A.G.A. has produced a copy of instructions/ letter dated 07.09.2025 which is taken on record. As per the aforesaid instructions, during the course of investigation, the name of the present petitioner has been dropped as no incriminating material or evidence has been found against him. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prashansa Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Arvind Kumar Maurya, Kanchan, Pawan Verma Ram Bahadur @ Ram Bahadur Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
In the wake of aforesaid development, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this writ petition, therefore, this writ petition is consigned to record. September 16, 2025 dk/ CRLP No. 7775 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEVENDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench