MOHAMMAD HAROON v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/1086/2025 · 2025-08-26
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159188 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159188 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1086 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. Heard Shri Puttu Lal Mishra, Learned Counsel for the applicant, and Shri Angad Kumar Vishwakarma, Learned Addl. Government Advocate, for the state. The applicant has filed this application anticipatory seeking bail in F.I.R./Case Crime No. 372 of 2024 under Sections 406, 419, 420, 506, 467, 468, 471, 120B, I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(Da), 3(1)(Dha), 3(2)(v), SC/ST Act, P.S. Antu, District Pratapgarh. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press this anticipatory bail application, and the applicant shall appear before the trial court and seek his release on bail. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of by observing that in case the applicant appears before the trial court and seeks his release on bail, his bail application shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, keeping in view the principles of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI, (2022) 10 SCC 51. August 26, 2025 A.Nigam Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Puttu Lal Misra, Prince Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Mohammad Haroon .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench