- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1965 WP No. 29717 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 29717 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: M/S. VENKATESWARA GARMENTS, PLOT NO 65-A, SY NO.15, KARUR INDUSTRIAL AREA, P.B.ROAD, DAVANAGERE - 577 004. REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS, 1. SRI GOPALAPPA, S/O SNNA HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT VIJAYANAGARA BADAVANE, KONDAJJI ROAD, DAVANAGERE - 577 004. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANAND GOWDA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MARUTHI.G.B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE BANK OF MYSORE REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, P.J.EXTENSION, DAVANGERE - 577 002. 2. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA MSME SPECIALIZED BRANCH, EMINENT TOWERS, 1ST FLOOR, OPP: BAPUJI DENTAL COLLEGE, P J EXTENSION, MCC "B" BLOCK, DAVANGERE - 577 004. REPRESENTED BY AUTHORIZED OFFICER. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1965 WP No. 29717 of 2017 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, ZILLADALITHA BHAVAN, KARURU CROSS, P.B.ROAD, DAVANGERE - 577 006. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, RAITHA BHAVAN, P.B.ROAD, DAVANGERE - 577 003. 5. SRI AJAR S/O ABDUL REHAMAN, NO 497/1, MAIN ROAD, AJAR NAGARA, DAVANAGERE. 6. SMT CHAITANAYA.N.PRAKASH S/O SRI NAGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.53, 18TH CROSS, 21ST MAIN, VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 40. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR.B., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & C/R2; SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R3 & 4; SRI. S.B.SADASIVAPPA., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Anand Gowda., counsel on behalf of Sri.Maruthi.G.B., for the petitioner has appeared in person. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1965 WP No. 29717 of 2017 Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken by the advocate on record and the petitioner to withdraw the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the order and will not file the Review Petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13