VEERPAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/7909/2025 · 2025-08-25
Subhash Vidyarthi
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159173 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159173 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7909 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Siddharth Sinha, learned counsel for the applicant, Smt. Kamlesh Kumari, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.84 of 2025 under Sections 140(1), 351(3) of B.N.S. registered at Police Station- Rahimabad, District- Lucknow. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 29.05.2025 against five persons, including the applicant, stating that because of a dispute regarding property and some illicit relations of the informant's brother with his sister-in-law, co-accused Rakesh Yadav, who is the co- brother of the informant's son, abducted the informant's son along with the other accused persons, including the applicant. 4. The victim reached the police station on his own within two hours since lodging of the FIR. 5. The medico-legal examination report of the victim mentions three contusions and the injuries were simple in nature. 6. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. 7. The applicant's involvement in another criminal case has been disclosed in para-33 of the bail application in which he has already been granted bail by means of an order dated 05.08.2024 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Appeal No.1063 of 2024. 8. Co-accused- Umesh Yadav has been granted bail by means of an order Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arun Sinha, Ram Chandra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Veerpal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
dated 29.07.2025 passed by this Court in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No.6938 of 2025.Another co-accused Balram Yadav has also been granted bail by this court by means of an order dated 18.08.2025, passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.7657 of 2025. 9. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application and he has submitted that allegations investigation in the present case is still pending. 10.
Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the victim has returned on his own within two hours since lodging of the FIR; the injuries suffered by the are simple in nature; the allegations levelled against the applicant are similar to that the allegations levelled against co-accused Umesh Yadav and Balram Yadav, who have already been granted bail, whereas the applicant is languishing in jail since 15.07.2025 and without making any observation with may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid case. 11. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 12. Let the applicant-Veerpal be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) that the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. August 25, 2025 Ram. BAIL No. 7909 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench