RAJ RAHIM KHAN S/O RAJ MAHMAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5358/2025 · 2025-05-05
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15916 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15916 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:18844] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2837/2025
1. Omaram S/o Jetharam, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Gopalpura Natdau, Police Station Chamu, District Jodhpur (Rajasthan) ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota)
2. Prakash S/o Amararam, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Taratar, Police Station Chohran, District Barmer (Rajasthan) ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5358/2025 Raj Rahim Khan S/o Raj Mahmad, R/o Nanawata Motaji Ki Khdki, Anklav, Police Station Anklav, District Anand (Gujarat). (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Singh Yaduvanshi Mr. Nitin Kumar Sharma with Mr. Gourav Shama For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 05/05/2025
1. The petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.25/2025 registered at Police Station Kanwas, District Kota Rural for offences under Section 19/54 of Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950.
[2025:RJ-JP:18844] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2837/2025]
2. Since both these cases arise out of common order, hence they are being decided by this single order.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. The petitioners are behind the bars since 31.1.2025. No recovery has been effected from petitioner Raj Rahim Khan and he is in custody since 13.3.2025. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications.
6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
7. Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Omaram, Prakash and Raj Rahim Khan be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J BMG/64-65