LOKESH MEENA S/O SHRI KAILARAM MEENA v. ARUN S/O DINESH
CW/5921/2025 · 2025-07-08
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15913 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15913 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:25080] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5921/2025 Lokesh Meena S/o Shri Kailaram Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Sankarwada, Tehsil Todabhim, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. Arun S/o Dinesh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Meena Seemla, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.)
2. Pushpendra S/o Dinesh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Meena Seemla, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.)
3. Khelanta Widow Of Dinesh, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Meena Seemla, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.)
4. Hardayal S/o Shri Motiram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Machadi, Tehsil Todabhim, District Karauli.
5. State Of Rajasthan, Through Landholder Tehsildar Sikrai, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.)
6. Sub-Registrar, Sikrai, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.)
7. Ramvilasi W/o Raghuveer, R/o 190, Premnagar, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shamsuddin Ansari For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order 08/07/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the original suit has been decided by the learned Court below. In view of above, the present writ petition has rendered infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
[2025:RJ-JP:25080] (2 of 2) [CW-5921/2025] Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /40