Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159124 (ALL)

RAM MILAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SULTANPUR AND OTHERS

A227/4983/2025 · 2025-08-22

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:49524 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4983 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Milan Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate, Sultanpur And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Roshan Kumar,Sudhir Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.2- Chief Revenue Officer, District Sultanpur to decide petitioner's case (correction of map) registered as computerized case No.T 202204680000171 renumbered as D 202504680003671 (Ram Milan Vs. Gaon Sabha and others) under Section 30 (1) of U.P. Revenue Code as amended by U.P. Ordinance No.4 of 2015, expeditiously. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.2 - Chief Revenue Officer, District Sultanpur is desired to make all endeavor to decide petitioner's case (correction of map) registered as computerized case No.T 202204680000171 renumbered as D 202504680003671 (Ram Milan Vs. Gaon Sabha and others) under Section 30 (1) of U.P. Revenue Code as amended by U.P. Ordinance No.4 of 2015, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 22.8.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench