NANDAN SINGH @ NANDAN SINGH THAYAT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/6894/2025 · 2025-08-25
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159117 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159117 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6894 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant,learned AGA for the State and perused the record. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 of the B.N.S.S.,2023, has been filed to with the prayer to quash the order dated 28.07.2025 passed by Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow in Case No. 11225/1996, pending in the court of Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow (State versus Raju @ Rajeev and Others), under section 392, 411 I.P.C. Po-ice Station Gazipur, District Lucknow as well as the Further proceedings initiated on the basis of aforesaid Chargesheet. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and was never involved in committing the offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. He added that due to enmity, his name has been planted in the first information report and thereafter he has been chargesheeted. He next added that due to unavoidable circumstances, he could not appear before the court below. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anurag Tilhari, Ashutosh Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Nandan Singh @ Nandan Singh Thayat .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties', it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and files bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). The application is disposed of accordingly. August 25, 2025 AKS A482 No. 6894 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench