SATISH PATEL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/7851/2025 · 2025-08-22
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159114 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159114 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:49543 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7851 of 2025 Applicant :- Satish Patel Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Shanker Lal Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Shanker Lal Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 64 of 2025, under Sections 309(4), 317(2) of BNS, registered at Police Station Sangramgarh, District Pratapgarh. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 20.04.2025 stating that three persons riding a motorcycle had robbed the informant of a mobile phone and Rs.8000/-. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant a young man aged 20 years and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant has been implicated in the present case on the basis of information received from a mukhbir while he was already in custody in another case since 30.04.2025 in connection with case crime no. 75 of 2025 and the applicant has already been granted bail in that case. 5. The learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State has opposed the prayer for bail and he has submitted that the involvement of the applicant has been established during investigation and charge-sheet has been submitted on 09.07.2025. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant had been implicated in the present case solely on the basis of information received from a mukhbir while he was already in custody in connection with another case, the applicant is languishing in jail since 30.04.2025, and without making any observation, which
may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 7. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 8.
Let the applicant-Satish Patel be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. Order Date :- 22.8.2025 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench