PRAMOD KUMAR UPADHYAY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/8426/2025 · 2025-09-09
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159100 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159100 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8426 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Virendra Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Abhinav Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. Learned A.G.A. has stated that Section 120B of I.P.C. has been added against the applicant.
3. Confronted with the aforesaid objection, the learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press this application and he will move an application before the Sessions court for his release on bail in added section.
4. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed as not pressed.
5. Let the certified copies annexed with the bail application be returned to the learned counsel for the applicant after retaining photocopies of the same on record. September 9, 2025 S. Shivhare Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Virendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Pramod Kumar Upadhyay .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench