Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1591 (ORI)

MANOJ KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/24629/2025 · 2026-03-11

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.24629 of 2025 Manoj Kumar Pandey …. Petitioner Mr. T.K. Biswal, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 11.03.2026 02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that the Hon'ble Court be graciously pleased to pass following relief(s):- (i) The Hon'ble Court be pleased to admit & allow this writ petition (ii) The Hon'ble Court be pleased by further directing the Opp. Party No.3 to allow the petitioner to continue in his post till disposal of the service dispute 46/2021 pending before the State Co-Op Tribunal by further granting all consequential service and financial benefits from the date of suspension within a time bound period for the interest of justice. (iii) The Hon'ble court be pleased to pass any other order(s) /direction(s) as deems fit & proper for the bonafide interest of justice. p. 2 p. 2 And for this act of kindness, the Petitioners shall as in duty bound ever pray”. 4. Taking into account the nature of order passed in the connected W.P.(C) No.35931 of 2022, this Court is of the view that no order can be passed as prayed for. Continuance of the Petitioner as prayed for will be subject to final outcome of the appeal to be filed in terms of the order passed today in W.P.(C) No.35931 of 2022. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat