ABHISHEK SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME, LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/7660/2025 · 2025-09-17
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159090 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159090 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7660 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
1. Heard Shri Lakshmana Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Shri Dinesh Singh Rana, learned AGA for the State.
2. Shri Shyam Narayan Pandey, Inspector-in-Charge, Police Station Gauriganj, District Amethi is present in person to assist the Court.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed supplementary affidavit and the same is taken on record.
4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the material available on record as well as considering the submission of the Inspector-in-charge, who is present in person, We find that as per allegation of the FIR, the cognizable offences are prima facie made out, therefore, the FIR cannot be set aside/ quashed. However, it is always open for the petitioner to file Anticipatory Bail Application before the Competent Court of law and the same may be decided on its own merit.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is consigned to record. September 17, 2025 Muk Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lakshmana Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Abhishek Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench