Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15907 (PNJ)

SANDEEP KAUR v. AJOY SHARMA, IAS AND OTHERS

COCP/307/2025 · 2025-07-28

Harkesh Manuja

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

154 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 307 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.07.2025 Sandeep Kaur .......... Petitioner Versus Ajoy Sharma, IAS, Additional Chief Secretary to Govt. of Punjab, Department of Forests and Wildlife Preservation, Punjab and others .......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Harbans Lal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Athar Ahmad, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for the respondents. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) CM-12134-CII-2025 Application for placing on record additional documents related to granting fresh appointment to the petitioner on compassionate grounds in the Department as Clerk alongwith Annexures R-2 to R-6, moved on behalf of the applicants-respondents, is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Copy thereof be supplied to the opposite side. Registry to do the needful. CM-11705-CII-2025 Application for placing on record additional documents related to granting fresh appointment to the petitioner on compassionate grounds in the Department as Clerk alongwith Annexures R-1 to R-29, moved on behalf of the applicants-respondents, is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Dinesh Kumar 2025.07.28 19:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP No. 307 of 2025 (O&M) [2] Copy thereof be supplied to the opposite side. Registry to do the needful. MAIN CASE Learned counsel for the respondents submits that necessary compliance has been made while passing a speaking order dated 14.10.2024 (annexed with the application bearing CM-12134-CII-2025 as Annexure R-2); thus, no cause survives in the present petition. [2] In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition, the same is disposed off accordingly. [3] In case the petitioner feels aggrieved, she would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid speaking order as per law. [4] Rule stands discharged. [5] Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. July 28, 2025 ( HARKESH MANUJA ) 'dk kamra' JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Dinesh Kumar 2025.07.28 19:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document