ANURAG KUMAR TRIPATHI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
WRIC/8099/2025 · 2025-08-25
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159060 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159060 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8099 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Govind Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Sri Mohd. Talib Khan, Advocate holding brief of Sri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for respondent no. 6.
2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that a suit for partition is pending before the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Kunda, District - Pratapgarh at the behest of respondent no. 2 where notices have been issued to the petitioners who have put in appearance and interim order has also been passed on 20.05.2025, directing the parties to maintain status quo.
3. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that interim
order dated 20.05.2025, respondent no. 5 is interfering in the possession of the petitioners and in the aforesaid circumstances, present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the Sub Divisional Magistrate to comply his
order dated 20.05.2025, passed in Case No. 7321 of 2025.
4. Learned Standing counsel, on the other hand, submits that the petitioners have equally efficacious and alternate remedy of executing the orders of revenue Court as per Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual where an
order of revenue authority can be executed.
5. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that liberty may be granted to the petitioners to approach the competent authority under Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual for execution of the orders passed by the Prescribed Authority as well as of the other authorities.
6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Govind Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Anurag Kumar Tripathi And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
approach competent authority by moving appropriate application under para 460 of Revenue Court Manual to execute the orders of the revenue authorities. In case, such an application is moved within two weeks from today the same shall be disposed of expeditiously. August 25, 2025 A. Verma WRIC No. 8099 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench