Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159053 (ALL)

KAUSHALENDRA NATH SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. A.C.S./PRIN. SECY. HOME LO. AND 3 OTHERS

A227/4991/2025 · 2025-08-25

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4991 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4 and Shri Shikhar Anand, learned counsel for respondent No.2. 2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Claim Petition No.1565/2021 (Kaushlendra Nath Singh vs. State of U.P. and others), filed on 01.08.2021, pending before State Public Services Tribunal, Indira Bhawan, Lucknow, Court No.10. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that although a large number of dates have been fixed, for reasons beyond control, the aforesaid claim petition has not yet been decided. 4. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the present petition pending. Rather, the ends of justice would be met by directing the U.P. State Public Services Tribunal, Indira Bhawan, Lucknow, to consider and decide the pending Claim Petition No.1565/2021, filed on 01.08.2021, most expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, preferably as expeditiously as possible, if there is no legal impediment. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhir Kumar Pandey, Pradeep Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shikhar Anand Kaushalendra Nath Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. A.C.S./Prin. Secy. Home Lo. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the merits of the case of either of the parties and the Court concerned shall consider and decide the claim petition of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of. August 25, 2025 Shubhankar A227 No. 4991 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHANKAR THAKUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench