Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159042 (ALL)

RAJESH PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO AND ANOTHER

BAILC/126/2024 · 2025-04-23

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23297 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 126 of 2024 Applicant :- Rajesh Pandey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko And Another Counsel for Applicant :- O.P. Tiwari,Gaurav Tripathi,Sridhar Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Shri Ashish Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Shri Gaurav Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, as well as Shri Rachit Sodhi, learned counsel for the State, and perused the record. 2. This is an application for cancellation of order dated 14.08.2024 passed by the Special Judge, MP-MLA/Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. XIX, Lucknow in Bail Application No.6035 of 2024, ordering release of opposite party no.2- Indal Kumar Rawat on bail. 3. The cancellation of the aforesaid order has been sought on the ground that the opposite party no. 2 had not disclosed his involvement in Case Crime No.361 of 2022 lodged at Police Station Bakshi-Ka-Talab and Case Crime No.040 of 2021 lodged at police station Wazeerganj, Lucknow. 4. On 20.09.2024, learned AGA was granted three weeks' time to seek instructions regarding status of the aforesaid cases. 5. On the basis of instructions, learned counsel for the State has submitted that the opposite party no. 2 is not involved in Case Crime No. 361 of 2022, although his father is an accused in that case, and in Case Crime No.040 of 2021 name of opposite party no. 2 has been exonerated by the investigating officer. 6. In view of the aforesaid facts, I find no good ground to cancel the order dated 14.08.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge, MP-MLA/Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. XIX, Lucknow, ordering release of the opposite party no. 2 on bail. 7. The application is, accordingly, rejected. . [Subhash Vidyarthi,J.] Order Date :- 23.4.2025MVS/- Digitally signed by :- MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench