VIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA v. TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL LALGANJ, AJHARA, PRATAPGARH AND OTHERS
A227/5009/2025 · 2025-08-25
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159039 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159039 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5009 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Vinajy Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 to decide the case no. 862 of 1999 now Computerized Case No. T202102570203977 (Virendra Kumar Vs. Rita Devi) U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 - Naib Tehsildar, Atheha, Tehsil - Lalganj, District Pratapgarh, is directed to decide case no. 862 of 1999 now Computerized Case No. T202102570203977 (Virendra Kumar Vs. Rita Devi) U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Virendra Kumar Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) Tehsildar, Tehsil Lalganj, Ajhara, Pratapgarh And Others .....Respondent(s)
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. August 25, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 5009 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench