RATI DEVI v. U.P. STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION LKO. THRU. MANAGING DIRECTOR AND ANOTHER
WRIA/9384/2025 · 2025-08-22
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159031 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159031 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9384 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Alina, Advocate holding brief of Sri Gaurav Mehrotra, Advocate who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the respondents no. 1 & 2 which is taken on record.
2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided.
3. The petitioner, a widow of one Sri Anil Kumar has approached this Court contending that Sri Anil Kumar had been appointed as Casual Labour in the year 2001 and died after having rendered continuous service of about twenty two years on 01.04.2023.
4. During the time, the petitioner's husband was working in the department, his case for regularization had also been processed but the final orders had not been passed.
5. Contention is that considering the long period of service rendered by the petitioner's husband, the petitioner may be considered for compassionate appointment.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.2 which may be directed to be Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ratnesh Singh Tomar, Arsh Bugga, Surya Prakash Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary Rati Devi .....Petitioner(s) U.P. State Warehousing Corporation Lko. Thru. Managing Director And Another .....Respondent(s)
decided within a fixed time frame to which Ms. Alina, Advocate holding brief of Sri Gaurav Mehrotra, Advocate has no objection.
7. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.2 then the respondent No.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation.
8. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of.
9. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. August 22, 2025 Pachhere/- WRIA No. 9384 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench