APHC010205692021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11752 OF 2021 Between: 1. Kukkala Chinna Thimmagurudu, @ Madakanti Chinna, S/o Ramana,Age 45years, Occ: Agriculturist, R/o Brahmanadoddi Village, C Belgal Mandal, Kurnool District. 2. Kukkala Sankaraiah, S/o Pedda Thimmagurudu, Aged about 45 years, R/o Brahmanadoddi Village, C Belgal Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Petitioners AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 4. The Station House Officer, C Belgal Police station, C Belgal Mandal, Kurnool District. 5. Chinna Rami Reddy Thummala Rami Reddy (Died), S/o Venkata Ranga Reddy, Aged about SOyears, R/o Brahmanadoddi Village, C Belgal Mandal, Kurnool District. 6. Kukkala Sankaraiah, S/o Minella, Aged about 43 years, Brahmanadoddi Village, C Belgal Mandal, Kurnool District. 7. Tummala Giridhar Reddy S/o T Rami Reddy, Aged about 30 years, R/o Brahmanadoddi Village, C Belgal Mandal, Kurnool District. R/o (R7 is brought on record as per LRs of deceased 5th respondent as per Courts Order dt.08.09.2025 in IA.No.1 of 2025) ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent police in interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents 5 and 6 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequentf^irect 3rd respondent police not to interfere in the civil disputes. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent police not to interfere in the civil disputes not to call the petitioners into the police station, pending disposahof the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners; SRI P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No. 7: SRI K RATHANGA PANI REDDY The Court made the following order: ■ V APHC010205692021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11752/2021 Between: I.KUKKALA CHINNA THIMMAGURUDU,@ MADAKANTI CHINNA,, S/0 OCC-AGRICULTURIST, C BELGAL MANDAL, RAMAN A,AGE 45YEARS, BRAHMANADODDI VILLAGE, DISTRICT. R/0 KURNOOL 2.KUKKALA SANKARAIAH,, S/0 PEDDA THIMMAGURUDU, AGED ABOUT 45YEARS, R/0 BRAHMANADODDI VILLAGE, C BELGAL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL,KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3.THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, C BELGAL POLICE STATION, C BELGAL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 5.CHINNA RAMI REDDY THUMMALA RAMI REDDY, S/0 VENKATA RANGA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50YEARS, R/0 BRAHMANADODDI VILLAGE, C BELGAL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6.KUKKALA SANKARAIAH, S/0 MINELLA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/0 BRAHMANADODDI VILLAGE, C BELGAL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the 4‘^ respondent police in interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents 5 and 6 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct 3rd respondent police not to interfere in the civil disputes and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME f The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: " ... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the 4^'^ respondent police in interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents 5 and 6 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct 3'^ respondent police not to interfere in the civil disputes and pass...." Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State and learned counsel for the respondents 5 and 6. Perused the material on record. Learned counsel for respondents 5 and 6 would submit that respondents 5 and 6 obtained an interim injunction from the competent Civil Court and suppressing the said fact, petitioners obtained an interim order from this Court Order dated 25.06,.2021 in lA No.l of 2021 and that there are no merits in the contentions of the petitioners and the Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that respondent Police never interfered in the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents and that this court may pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition. A perusal of the material on record, no contra material is placed on record by the Petitioners by controverting the contention of the learned counsel for the respondents 5 and 6. In that view, this writ petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K.KASI RAO ACHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// // ^ SECTION DPFfcHR To, One CC to Sri. P Narasimhulu, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri. K Rathanga Pani Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Home High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT Two CD Copies GSC , 1. 2. 3. 4. HIGH COURT DATED:08/09/2025 ORDER WP NO. 11752 OF 2021 O ov ^ 25 SEP 2025 m ^ Current Section %5;a^SPATC^!^ DISMISSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS