SMT. RITA DEVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/5008/2025 · 2025-08-25
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159016 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159016 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5008 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Mohak Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for petitioner at the very outset submits that he does not wish to press the preset writ petition with regard to the prayer made for a direction to decide the Case No. 209/23 (T202304040100209) expeditiously and submits that the writ petition in respect to direction for expeditious disposal of Case No. 209/23 (T202304040100209) may be dismissed as not pressed with a liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed in respect to expeditious disposal of Case No. 209/23 (T202304040100209) with the aforesaid liberty.
5. Further, view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the Case No. 2929/23 (T202304040102929) in the time bound manner.
7. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohak Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Rita Devi And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 - Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Akbarpur, Ambedkar Nagar is directed to decide Case No. 2929/23 (T202304040102929), expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
9. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
10. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. August 25, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 5008 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench